Once you have a web site as well as an application, pace is extremely important. The faster your site performs and then the faster your applications function, the better for everyone. Given that a web site is simply a collection of data files that interact with each other, the devices that store and access these data files play a vital role in web site functionality.

Hard disk drives, or HDDs, were, until recent times, the most trustworthy devices for saving information. However, lately solid–state drives, or SSDs, are already gathering popularity. Look into our comparability chart to find out whether HDDs or SSDs are more effective for you.

1. Access Time

Image

SSD drives offer a brand new & inventive approach to file storage using the utilization of electronic interfaces rather than any kind of moving components and spinning disks. This brand new technology is faster, making it possible for a 0.1 millisecond data file accessibility time.

Image

HDD drives count on spinning disks for data storage applications. Every time a file is being accessed, you need to await the correct disk to get to the correct position for the laser beam to view the file involved. This results in an average access speed of 5 to 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

Due to the brand new significant data file storage solution shared by SSDs, they give you a lot quicker file access speeds and better random I/O performance.

In the course of Review Hosting’s lab tests, all SSDs demonstrated their capacity to handle at the very least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

With an HDD drive, the I/O performance gradually improves the more you use the hard drive. Nonetheless, once it reaches a particular limitation, it can’t get quicker. And due to the now–old technology, that I/O restriction is noticeably below what you could have with a SSD.

HDD are only able to go so far as 400 IO’s per second.

3. Reliability

Image

SSD drives are created to include as less moving components as feasible. They utilize a similar technology like the one found in flash drives and are generally significantly more dependable when compared to common HDD drives.

SSDs have an common failure rate of 0.5%.

Image

As we have previously documented, HDD drives use rotating disks. And anything that employs a lot of moving components for extented time frames is prone to failure.

HDD drives’ normal rate of failure varies somewhere between 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSD drives work almost soundlessly; they don’t generate excess heat; they don’t demand additional chilling methods as well as use up significantly less power.

Trials have demonstrated that the common electrical power use of an SSD drive is between 2 and 5 watts.

Image

HDD drives are famous for being noisy. They need a lot more electrical power for air conditioning purposes. On a hosting server containing a variety of HDDs running continually, you need a lot of fans to make sure they’re cooler – this makes them much less energy–efficient than SSD drives.

HDDs consume between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

SSD drives enable quicker data file accessibility rates, which will, in turn, permit the CPU to perform data calls considerably quicker and after that to return to additional responsibilities.

The regular I/O wait for SSD drives is simply 1%.

Image

When compared to SSDs, HDDs allow for reduced data file access rates. The CPU will need to lose time waiting for the HDD to come back the requested file, saving its resources in the meanwhile.

The standard I/O delay for HDD drives is about 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

It’s about time for several real–world cases. We, at Review Hosting, competed a full platform backup on a server using only SSDs for file storage uses. During that process, the common service time for any I/O query kept under 20 ms.

Image

Throughout the exact same trials with the same server, this time installed out utilizing HDDs, overall performance was noticeably slow. All through the web server back–up procedure, the average service time for I/O calls varied between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

Speaking about backups and SSDs – we’ve detected a significant enhancement in the back–up speed since we turned to SSDs. Currently, a normal web server back–up will take simply 6 hours.

Image

On the flip side, on a server with HDD drives, a comparable data backup might take 3 to 4 times as long to complete. An entire backup of an HDD–driven web server typically takes 20 to 24 hours.

Should you wish to instantly boost the general performance of your web sites and never have to adjust just about any code, an SSD–driven website hosting service is a good alternative. Check our Linux shared web hosting packages – our solutions have extremely fast SSD drives and can be found at the best prices.

  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Each one of our Virtual Private Servers is installed for you absolutely free. 99.9% network uptime. Full root and SSH access.

  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Review the tools and characteristics coming with Review Hosting’s Virtual Private Servers. You could start off with a cheaper VPS Hosting setup and upgrade with a click as your needs increase.
  • Compare our hosting plans

  • Contact Us

  •  
  • It is easy to get in touch with us 24/7/365 by email or by using our really–fast ticketing system. Review Hosting offers a 1–hour reply time frame warranty.